8:59 AM
A few days ago, the US Supreme Court's final ruling on gay marriage is legal. Facebook and other social media to spread the news far and because of the different countries and demonstrating the verdict is still stirred up controversy. Comment follow-conned several people had watched with sadness the absence of information on topics that are often filthy diatribe. To bring the line of the train is the purpose of the writing. The society and the time have come to this judgment, it is not that we cannot understand the meaning of the judgment.
Before the verdict, gay rights:
American government state and the local government ("federal") split in the government. General state law can create their own independent states. Therefore, each state has the same crime, different levels of punishment, the tax rate varied between different places, and so on. However, some basic laws imposed by the federal way, which is bound by the state. For example the anti-slavery laws. Slavery was legal in many states until a time in the south, but at one point it was prohibited by law nationwide.
Quite a large portion of the 50 states in America for many years has the right to gay marriage. Therefore, it is not the way to gay marriage suddenly became clear. Until this ruling, some fundamental discrepancies, which were not swept away after the verdict? They are -
1) the state of the country is different, but the state would not have homosexuals to marry.
Ii) a gay couple married in one state to a different state if the marriage would not be considered illegal.
The discrepancy between the two talked over the problem for a wedding of any kind. For example, when you get married in Bangladesh, Malaysia is not considered, or when you get married in New York, Virginia, is being considered. This would be unnecessary suffering. Due to the complexities of the normal lives of the disabled will be. Those matters have been resolved with the verdict.
As a result, in the judgment of the gay rights
Because homosexuality, rationality, scientific explanation, and religious instruction has been a lot of talks, argue, is the will. The talks are part of that. Let's ruling is the first key to change.
Non-married men and women of America in the eyes of the law, there is no obstacle. The social way to observe it in different places, but in the eyes of the law it is a punishable offense. Two adult people in their homes, voluntarily, to do or say anything that does not violate the law. We're in the conventional sense, "Stone throwing," I know that. Living together in a 'partnership' to live as his own wear, but they are deprived of the right to be present.
Let us look at some of these rights at a glance.
- Married couple of kin to each other ("Next of Kin") will receive the recognition. As a result, no one will be able to stay by his side, the other is ill in hospital.
- Family life and other insurance to be able to stay under. As a result, everyone will be able to benefit from one’s health insurance.
- The tax application may be submitted jointly. As a result, the individual will not have to bear the cost of the additional tax.
- Do not be deprived of inheritance. As a result, no one died, the other one will be able to inherit the property.
- Because we could not get a divorce, asset sharing, the Family Court about the deteriorating security, etc., will be deprived of the benefits.
- Family holidays cannot be denied. As a result, if someone is sick or dies, the other can take.
- Migration as a recognized couple. As a result, no one in the other one will take over.
- The right to adopt children. As a result of adoption, the child can be found in the nearest relative status, the child's social and legal security.
- Released to meet before the court. As a result, no one shall be compelled to give evidence in court against the other, not just as a husband and a wife to testify against each other legally protected.
There's all that matters more to protect the rights of the married couple. To tell the difference so long were deprived of opportunities to become married homosexuals. As a result of this judgment, the way these rights will be protected for them.
The main reason behind the decision
The 5-4 vote of the Supreme Court has passed same-sex marriage rights. Judges explained their positions to the opposition party’s comment on the details. Social media is a big part of the argument against gay marriage classical ("traditional") referred to in the definition of women and men are talking, and that is reflected in several of the state's own laws. Some opposed the decision of the judges, as they have a right to their own state laws. Literally translated as far as possible the observance of the Constitution the Supreme Court, the right-wing / defensive judges often take.
The ruling party, the judges think, that marriage is a fundamental right of all citizens to be equal. All citizens are equal before the law and the Constitution, a variety of institutional security, equal rights for everyone, so everyone should be married facilities.
Posted in: 
0 comments:
Post a Comment